Akta Gaji Minima..Berapa ramai rakyat Malaysia yang memahaminya secara jelas?
The real reason Malaysian productivity is low is not because workers are not productive. It is due to the fact that employers have been successful in suppressing wages, and there is no incentive to invest in research and development for productivity improvement.
AFTER much debate, the Government has announced that the Minimum Wage Bill will be tabled in Parliament next month.
Even Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has stated that companies must embrace minimum wage as a strategy and an opportunity to revitalise their businesses.
This is one of the most important and eagerly awaited piece of legislation as workers have long cherished a hope for higher income.
Employers, on the other hand, are concerned that it might drive up the cost of production so much so that their businesses may not be viable anymore.
I am part of the MTUC’s efforts striving for a minimum wage during the past decade. I am fully aware that employers with their powerful political connections can still derail the legislation, or worse, dilute it until it becomes meaningless and ineffective.
Let me address some concerns and misconception about minimum wage. It must be noted that minimum wage is not just a social tool to reduce poverty; it is a fiscal tool to enhance economic growth and improve productivity.
Wages should be determined by market forces
Employers have successfully convinced the government over the past 40 years to let wages be determined by market forces. The evidence has clearly pointed to the fact that wage levels in Malaysia have been suppressed and have lagged behind by all measures.
The World Bank has reported that wages in Malaysia increased by only 2.6% per annum. That is below inflation. The proportion of wages as a portion of GDP has also fallen.
The 2010 National Employment Returns showed that 34% of Malaysians earned less than RM700 — below poverty line of RM842 in Sarawak.
In Sabah and Sarawak, where the cost of living is much higher, the figures are a dismal 63% and 48% respectively. A further 37% nationwide earned between RM700 and RM1,500. For a country aiming to be a developed nation in 10 years’ time, it is alarming that 72% of workers earned less than RM1,500. These are collaborated by similar figures from the Employees Provident Fund.
Fifteen years ago, the salary of a part-time worker at a fast-food restaurant was RM3.80 an hour. Today it is just RM2.80 while the price of a burger has gone up from RM1.20 to more than RM4 in the same period.
So clearly market forces have not worked. There are two reasons:
·Stiffled trade unions — Market forces are controlled by business, and combined with the government policy of stifling trade unionism by segregating trade unions, only 3% of private sector workers are trade union members, and less than 2% are covered by collective agreements. While the number of trade unions has increased most of the unions are in-house unions with less than 100 members.
·The presence of millions of foreign workers — Malaysia is perhaps the only country in the world that made it extremely difficult for high-value and knowledgeable workers to work here, but has welcomed millions of low-wage and unskilled workers. This has undoubtedly suppressed wages, as Malaysian workers have to compete for low wages.
Will minimum wage lead to retrencments and business closure?
If companies are legally compelled to pay their employees more than they can afford, then naturally they would have to retrench their workers.
Firstly, the presence of more than two million legal (and God knows how many illegal) foreign workers shows that there is no unemployment in Malaysia. Our official unemployment rate is less than 4%, which by World Bank standards show full employment.
Secondly, if indeed it is true that minimum wage will lead to some retrenchment, it will be those low income workers who are mostly foreigners. Surely, this will help our nation’s objective to reduce foreign workers. It will also be in line with our aim to move away from a low-wage labour intensive manufacturing based to up the higher value chain.
Frankly, if a firm cannot even provide a decent living wage to its workers — one that is enough to meet their basic needs — it has no business being in business.
Will minimum wage reduce productivity?
If a company now has 100 workers each earning an average of RM500 a month, and if the minimum wage is to be increased to RM900, its wage bill will now be RM90,000 instead of RM50,000 — a huge increase and may not be sustainable.
However the real question is does it really need 100 lowly paid, low-value workers?
You can tap rubber for 25 hours a day, but if you still use the same tapping tools your grandfather used, how do you increase output? Or the construction workers who still use hand-assembled timber formwork to construct flyovers and buildings instead of pre-frabricated ones or the toll operator who has to manually hand out tickets?
The answer would be to automate the issuance of tickets. But employers would not invest in machines or integrated building systems (IBS) because it is more profitable to employ cheap labour. In Incheon Airport in South Korea, two women in their sixties can effectively manage the luggage trolleys, while in KLIA we have an army of Bangladeshis.
This is not because Korean women eat lots of ginseng, but they have a machine that collects the trolleys magnetically and tows them along.
In Malaysia the banking industry is a shining example. The banking industry is the most densely unionised, with even assistant managers being union members. Wage levels are amongst the highest in the country.
Yes, once in a while you hear of picketing, but productivity and more importantly profits are consistently the highest in the country.
Investment in technology and management systems is the highest and business efficiency has improved to an extent that banking now is global, 24 hours a day, seven days a week and 52 weeks a year. And apart from some expatriates, there is not a single lowly paid foreign worker.
The real reason that Malaysian productivity is low is not because workers are not productive. It is due to the fact that employers were very successful in suppressing wages. There is no incentive to invest in research and development for productivity improvement. It is more profitable for employers to pay RM12 a day for foreign labour.
So higher wages and a minimum wage will lead to higher productivity. Higher wages will encourage employers to invest in research and development to increase overall productivity and efficiency.
A minimum wage will not hurt Malaysia’s competitiveness
Our competitors in the 1980s, Taiwan and Korea and even Hong Kong, the bastion of capitalism and free markets, have minimum wage systems while in Singapore the head of the trade union movement is a government minister and thus the country is able to formulate an inclusive wage policy that has seen wage levels more than three times higher than Malaysia and productivity growth that has outstripped us.
These four countries have overtaken us, became high-income nations while we now compete with Vietnam, Indonesia and Philippines.
More than 90% of countries worldwide have minimum wages. Empirical evidence in more than 100 countries worldwide showed that there is minimal negative impact on competitiveness and unemployment where a reasonable, value adjusted, and regularly reviewed minimum wage is implemented.
To be a high-income nation under New Economic Model, the government has to be serious and change our policy of being a low-wage country, restructure employment to create decent and productive jobs. A minimum wage policy will go a long way to achieving this aim.
A major benefit to the country is that higher wages will lead to higher purchasing power that will lead to increase domestic demand and more business for local companies.
What should be the minimum wage?
It appears that the bill to be tabled in Parliament will provide for setting up of a National Minimum Wage Council (NMWCC) that will be mandated to determine and review the level of minimum wage. I would urge that this be a tripartite body with independent experts and representatives from employers and employees.
This should allay fears that the minimum wage level will be set arbitrarily. I am confident that the NMWCC will be able to set a minimum wage after taking into account relevant factors, including cost of business, cost of living and regional differences. It must always bear in mind that a big bold initiative is needed to make Malaysia a high-income nation.
sumber the star online.
xde versi melayu ke tt? hamba ni x pandai sangat bace omputih..huhu..
samo r kita...buta english....
__________________ Live is Love Kehidupan iNi kadAnGkaLA bAnyaK yANg meNYediHkaN kiTa...InI kErAnA KiTa hANya meMPuNyai sEdiKIt sAhAJa WaKTu yAnG MEMbahagIAkan kItA..oLeH iTU hARgaILaH saAt2 KeTIkA kIta SEDang meNgecapi keBAhagIaAn...
Perlunya Akta Gaji Minima
By , on 5 June 2008
Kalau negara yang lebih miskin seperti Sri Lanka, Pakisatan, Bangladesh dan Vietnam boleh ada Gaji Minima, kenapa bukan Malaysia yang lebih maju dan membangun daripada mereka, tanya Jerit. Tak cukup sekadar mempunyai bangunan tinggi sepert KLCC, taraf hidup rakyat pun perlulah ditingkatkan.
“The government is not going to grant a standard wage, be it RM900 or RM1,500 a month, to all sectors.” (NST, 3 June 2008)
Jaringan Rakyat Tertindas (Jerit) mengecam kenyataan Menteri Sumber Manusia, Datuk Dr. S. Subramaniam bahawa gaji minima untuk pekerja swasta secara keseluruhannya tidak akan diimplimentasi di Malaysia. Ini adalah penganiyaan besar kepada 90 peratus pekerja sektor swasta di Malaysia.
Perjuangan pekerja untuk Akta Gaji Minima
Sejak tahun 2003 lagi, Jerit telah menyeru pihak kerajaan supaya menggubal Akta Gaji Minima RM900. Pada 21 September 2006, sebanyak 50,000 tuntutuan dan memorandum diserahkan kepada YAB Perdana Menteri menuntutnya menggubal Akta Gaji Minima.
Selain itu, Kesatuan Sekerja Nasional (MTUC) juga pada tahun lepas telah mengadakan beberapa piket menuntut Akta Gaji Minima RM900 dan Cola. Baru-baru ini juga, MTUC telah memberi memorandum kepada Menteri Sumber Manusia yang baru, Datuk Dr. S. Subramaniam, di Parlimen berkenaan dengan hal ini.
Bukan itu sahaja , pada zaman Tun Mahathir jadi Perdana Menteri pun , beliau telah menyatakan perlu Akta Gaji Minima RM1200 untuk pekerja Malaysia. Mana pergi janji ini ?
Majlis Gaji (Wage Council) bukan satu penyelesaian!
Semua ini telah diketepikan oleh kerajaan Malaysia. Nampaknya kerajaan telah tolak tuntutan pekerja dan cuba mengaburkan pekerja dengan mengatakan tiada Gaji Minima, tetapi Majlis Gaji atau Wage Council boleh diamalkan untuk semua sektor atas permintaan pekerja atau majikan.
Sebelum ini, perkara yang sama juga telah dilakukan oleh Datuk Fong Chan Onn, bekas Menteri di mana Fong telah mengumumkan bahawa Majlis Gaji akan ditubuhkan di beberapa sektor bergaji rendah seperti pengawal keselamatan swasta, pembantu klinik swasta dan cleaner. Namun isu gaji rendah tidak selesai untuk sektor ini mahupun sektor lain.
Adalah jelas bahawa cadangan menteri untuk wage council tidak akan menyelesaikan isu gaji rendah pekerja . Wage council akan disertai oleh wakil pekerja, wakil kerajaan dan wakil majikan juga. Adakah majikan akan setuju untuk memberi gaji yang saksama dan adil untuk pekerja ? Tidak sama sekali. Mereka akan sentiasa cuba mengurangkan kos dengan mengurangkan gaji pekerja supaya mereka dapat untung tinggi. Maka siapakah yang patut bela nasib pekerja kalau tidak kerajaan .Tetapi, nampaknya kerajaan telah cuci tangan dalam membela nasib pekerja dan menendang pula ke Majlis Gaji yang dianggotai oleh majikan.
Pekerja Asing – Bukan alasan untuk menolak Akta Gaji Minima!
Adalah penting bagi Menteri Sumber Manusia untuk memahami mengenai konsep gaji minima. Gaji dibayar untuk jumlah tenaga kerja yang telah disumbangkan oleh seseorang pekerja. Oleh itu, sama ada pekerja tempatan mahupun pekerja asing harus dibayar gaji yang sama rata untuk tenaga kerja mereka. Apakah salahnya jika seseorang pekerja asing menerima gaji minima RM900 atau RM1,500? Bukankah mereka juga menyumbang kepada pembangunan serta GDP negara?
Kenaikan harga barangan: Perlu Akta Minima
Pada masa kini, harga barangan terutamanya harga barang makanan melambung tinggi. Bukan itu sahaja, harga petrol dan bahan bakar juga naiki. Dalam keadaan ini adalah penting untuk mengubal Akta Gaji Minima supaya rakyat terutamanya pekerja yang berpendapatan rendah dapat menghadapi kenaikan harga dan menjalankan hidup.
Kalau negara yang lebih miskin seperti Sri Lanka, Pakisatan, Bangladesh dan Vietnam boleh ada Gaji Minima, kenapa bukan Malaysia yang lebih maju dan membangun daripada mereka. Tak cukup sekadar mempunyai bangunan tinggi sepert KLCC, taraf hidup rakyat pun perlulah ditingkatkan. Untuk itu Gubal Akta Gaji Minima dan berhenti menganiaya pekerja Malaysia yang merupakan tulang belakang pembangunan negara.
tapi ayat pekerja mesia suma tidak produktif adalah salah...
klau tgk2 yng keje kilang tu..adakah tak produktif?mereka kerja rajin gak..tapi gaji mcm tu ajer..
betul tu..saya ada mengikuti forum akta gaji min di hotel putra KL tahun lepas bersama MTUC dan KJ bersama ahli akademik PROF.Fauziah(kalau x silap)..graf produktiviti pekerja meningkat saban tahun...senang cerita teruk KJ dan kerajaan kena smash dgn otai2 wakil2 kesatuan sekerja dan yg hadir masa tu..
mmg patut ada gaji minima....tp jgn la main letak je RM700....yg tu takyah gaji minima pon mmg kebanyakan org dah dapat (dan still miskin)...
dan yg merisaukan adalah syarikat swasta akan mengambil kesempatan utk tidak menaikkan gaji dgn alasan mereka dah bayar gaji minima...so gaji minima kene selaras setiap 6 bulan patutnye...
PS: jgn lepas ni ada fresh graduate dpt gaji 700 udah la
Disclaimer : All posts made by either members or mods even admins on CariGold.com are just only individual opinions, not necessarily or specifically those of CariGold.com or it's owner.
CariGold does neither support, endorse nor vouch any programs and/or opportunities discussed here. We also does not give/offer investment advice and we does not research the opportunities discussed here. We simply provide a place for discussion. YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN RESPONSIBILITY IF YOU LOSE SUM OF MONEY IN ANY PROGRAMS DISCUSSED HERE